AutoBet Theorem

[kraada]

So we're explaining this abstract statement:

SIMILAR TO '(X|Y)%'

SIMILAR TO means to match the following pattern, which can include regular expressions. (LIKE uses simpler pattern matching, = checks for identical strings.)

The ()s match in this case just one character: X|Y. The | means "or", so if the string starts 'X' or 'Y' we're good so far.

% is a wildcard, matching literally anything else. So any string that starts X or Y will count. These strings will match: Xander, Yellow, XYZZY. These strings will not match: x, yup, bing blang blaow.

I hope that clarifies? :)

[js2002]

oh upercase only when written uppercase, that helped !
doesnt matter for these PT3 strings but for other coding....

[kraada]

Glad to hear that helped :)

[preparac]

Hm... At first glance I get a feeling similar to

SIMILAR TO '(Understanding|Capable to aply)%'

but then on the other side I would LIKE to be more sure about the difference between LIKE and SIMILAR TO ...

Is it be possible to translate a SIMILAR TO '(X|Y)%' statement into a LIKE 'XYZ%' statement? (at least sometimes, depending on how I define the XYZ part?)

Or to combine two LIKE statements to get the same resulat as with a SIMILAR TO statement ... as f. ex.: (SIMILAR TO '(F|XF)%') = (LIKE F% OR LIKE 'XF%') ??

...

[kraada]

(SIMILAR TO '(F|XF)%') = (LIKE 'F%' OR LIKE 'XF%')

That equality is true. I believe the former will be slightly faster, though I'm not 100% certain. Either way, once you get used to the notation, it is much easier to read when you have complicated things going on.

[preparac]

Ok, i got it now thanks.

Next thing i must get clear...

I thin how I have to construct the nominator for hero betting in Position in an unraised pot

sum( if[((lookup_actions_p.action = 'X' OR lookup_actions_p.action = 'C') AND tourney_holdem_hand_player_detail.amt_p_raise_facing = 0) AND lookup_actions_f.action LIKE 'B%' AND (tourney_holdem_hand_player_detail.val_f_bet_aggressor_pos < tourney_holdem_hand_player_statistics.position AND val_t_bet_aggressor_pos = -1), 1, 0 ] )

But how i construct the denominator for all situation, where I could have made a bet in an unraised pot in position? ... if ther is no agressor, how to compare the two (or more) players position?

[preparac]

... with
holdem_hand_player_detail.flg_f_has_position
?
... bujt then I probably also should buidl the nominator with this flg instead of the (tourney_holdem_hand_player_detail.val_f_bet_aggressor_pos < tourney_holdem_hand_player_statistics.position AND val_t_bet_aggressor_pos = -1) thing ... at least for multiway flops?

[js2002]

I think you cant do that.

I do fllowing:

I have a Steal unraised Pot Stat

and

Stats für HU (Heapsup) situations.

Thats enough for me.

I just need tendencies and that are really enough I get a view on how the player thinks (of poker/his game etc).

[preparac]

(Hm, I don't know ... there are some players types, who in an unraised pot play even more depending on their absolute position than on the number of plrs in the pot.
So me myself f.ex. I think I tend to steal to much, when I am in position (or I do not defend enough against Check raises) and i do not "donk" enough OOP in unraised pots but Checkfold or Checkcall to much ... I think this is exploitable ...)

[WhiteRider]

... with
holdem_hand_player_detail.flg_f_has_position
?
... bujt then I probably also should buidl the nominator with this flg instead of the (tourney_holdem_hand_player_detail.val_f_bet_aggressor_pos < tourney_holdem_hand_player_statistics.position AND val_t_bet_aggressor_pos = -1) thing ... at least for multiway flops?

Yes, you'll need to use "has position".
If the player bet then the flop bet aggressor position will be -1 because they ARE the flop aggressor, so it doesn't make sense to compare that with their own position.